Denmark – Belgium, Nations League Prediction


Valuable Predictions
Tips Reasoning

ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION FOR DENMARK - BELGIUM
💹 Denmark holds a top level
Denmark has always had a lot of quality players. At the moment it is the same, and the team has not lost in 15 consecutive matches. Poulsen is a key player in attack for Denmark, who also played a strong season in the Champions League for Leipzig. The only problem may be the weak form of Eriksen, who is experiencing difficulties at Inter and has not played much lately, and in Denmark he is a key player and almost everything depends on him when it comes to creativity in attack.
🔥 Belgium has the best for the match
We have written many times in analyzes of matches in Belgium that the Red Devils are great professionals, and given that they have one of the best teams in the world, you can almost always bet on them. Accordingly, Belgium is one of the few top, top national teams that do not underestimate the Nations League tournament in the slightest. During the last campaign, however, they lost shockingly to Switzerland in the last match and could not qualify for the finals and now they want to correct this mistake, so all the best players for the country will have the opportunity to take part in the match.
The Belgians are better than Denmark and will prove it
Expert view: No matter how strong the Danes are, Belgium is in the top 5 or top 10 of the best national teams in the world and we think they will win the match. However, our prediction for Belgium’s victory is not so certain, so we decided to make sure with an alternative one such as Belgium to score in the second half at 1.53. The truth is that we expect a much more open match in the second part, in which the Red Devils will develop their potential in attack.
DENMARK TEAM NEWS
Out (injuries/other): Larsen (29/1 d), Schöne (50/3 m) and Ankersen (27/1 m)
BELGIUM TEAM NEWS

Out (injuries/other): Courtois (79/0 g), De Bruyne (74/19 m), Benteke (37/15 f) and Chadli (59/8 m)
Other tips
Author
Other Predictions




If we missed something, add it in the comments