Manchester City – Wolverhampton, Prediction – Premier League


Valuable Predictions
Tips Reasoning

ANALYSIS AND TIP FOR CITY - WOLVES
👍 Man City is already instilling fear in its rivals
Manchester City with 20 consecutive victories in all tournaments, which hardly anyone suspected could happen in a top league this season under the conditions. Here is Guardiola’s team achieving it without real strikers for almost the entire campaign, although Aguero has finally returned. In the last round, the citizens defeated West Ham 2-1 and further increased the difference to the top. It is already 12 points and the Manchester derby is coming up. Very soon City will probably find themselves in the position of Liverpool from last season and at some point, we will just count the rounds that remain until Man C becomes champion.
ℹ️ Wolves continue their small series without a loss
Wolves already have 5 consecutive games without a loss after that nightmarish period for the team, in which he achieved only 1 victory in 11 games and that victory in the last second of the match against Chelsea. Now Wolverhampton took on loan from Real Sociedad a very important player named Willian Jose to replace Jimenez temporarily. Jose has no goal, but has recorded an assist and has already played 7 Premier League games since joining Wanderers in January.
We can’t expect a rough match at the Etihad
Expert view: Man City is a team that has a lot of control over the ball. Wolves will play on counterattacks, which is perfectly normal. In general, the Premier League is not known as a championship where it is easy to see many cards. This is a fact, especially in Man City matches. That’s why the lines are so low, unlike championships like La Liga or Serie A, for example. Cavanagh has already refereed 3 games for City this season and only 1 had more cards, against Arsenal, however. Wolves are not a rough team, so we expect a calm game without a large number of violations and fouls. Forecast – Under 2.5 cards at 1.80.
Other tips
Author
Other Predictions




If we missed something, add it in the comments