Liverpool – Ajax, Prediction – Champions League


Valuable Predictions
Tips Reasoning

ANALYSIS AND TIP FOR LIVERPOOL - AJAX
😔 Liverpool are terribly unlucky this season
Liverpool have too many injured players this season. The main reason, of course, is bad luck, but there is something else. The schedule for the Reds is deadly, and besides, they did not have quality pre-season training, which, of course, applies to everyone, but we should not forget how intensely Liverpool played in the last two seasons. Those first 97 and then 98 points in the championship garnished with winning the Champions League are not achieved without a huge amount of physical energy spent, and the Reds have definitely had too many games in the last two seasons, most of all in England. Now because of the rotations and because they have won their first three games, Liverpool have allowed themselves some relaxation against Atalanta and this has proved fatal because they lost 0-2 to Anfield last week.
🔝 Ajax is in top form and has caught up well after the first meeting with Liverpool
Since losing to Liverpool 0-1 at home, Ajax have 7 wins and 1 draw in their next matches. Tan Haag’s team is extremely offensive and scores as many goals as it has always done. For these 8 matches, Ajax scored 33 goals, which is an average of over 4 goals per game. For Ajax, this match is very important, but even if they lose it, they will have the opportunity to qualify ahead in a victory over Atalanta in the last match in Amsterdam.
Liverpool will not play casually this time
Expert view: The Reds cannot underestimate a second match in a row, because the situation in the group has changed. In the last match, the English champ needed a victory to be sure to qualify, and now with a loss, they have a chance not to do so. Klopp tries to rotate a lot and gives as much rest as possible to important players. We expect this time the reds to play a quality match and win, even though Ajax is in shape. Prediction – Liverpool to win at 1.66.
Other tips
Author
Other Predictions




If we missed something, add it in the comments